MorseWorcester294

出典: くみこみックス

I have seen a lot of modifications in my forty years as a expert management consultant, particularly in the enterprise change and management improvement practices. My specialty is applying information technologies for the advantage of the company. In the 1960s and 1970s, we developed details systems from the ground up to satisfy user needs. It was clear that customers could not envisage how IT could actually benefit the organization. So a lot of our worth was in helping customers define and comprehend the primary outcomes the business had to produce and then in designing the complete man-machine remedy to make much better outcomes. We did not implement the technique, we implemented the methods and procedures to increase results using the system.

Then in the 1980s, issues started to change. Application packages quickly replaced custom development. This lowered the cost of a good quality technique, but it also designed a gap between the technique and the company.

Because he no longer developed the technique, the skilled, who understood the business, had to dig deep to comprehend the functionality of the package to apply the advanced characteristics that enabled the organization to enhance. The specialist who understood the package did not understand the company and saw his role as explaining use of technique.

For consultants, employing the application package to enhance the company was tough and risky. The danger had to be contained, so the approach became system implementation to convert a defined portion of the current enterprise over the new program.

So consultants chased the new company chance in packaged method implementation. It began with the large audit consultants, whose strategy to consulting tended to parallel the strategy to auditing--use junior staff to follow methodologies and create deliverables.

Consulting firms created methodologies for system preparing, program evaluation and acquisition, and technique implementation. The strategies had been executed by junior consultants, who no longer necessary the analytical capabilities and company expertise of past experts.

Methodologies began to spread to other facets of consulting like strategic preparing, and so forth. In the 1990s a new wave came in enterprise method re-engineering, generating new organization transformation methodologies. These methodologies concentrated on the business, but avoided IT, considering that enterprise modify could be executed speedily, and IT adjust was notoriously slow. This developed a gap the other way among the company and the program.

Then integrated applications systems were relabeled as ERP systems and proclaimed to employ business very best practices that would automatically solve the dilemma. A lot of consultants supported a specific ERP package implementation, so then technique arranging and technique evaluation and acquisition methodologies favored that package to bring in the huge implementation revenues.

But, ERP system implementation employed the exact same implementation methodologies that concentrated on conversion of existing data, organization rules, and practices. Employing market finest practices essential sturdy user work beyond what the consultants offered.

In current years, there have been exposes of the issues with management consulting. Books have been written about the poor practice that also created within management consulting firms.

Significantly of the professionalism has gone out of management consulting. What do we have to do the bring professionalism back into consulting, especially for business alter and management improvement consulting.

This is one of the troubles we have been discussing at the Company Change Forum, in order to define issues with conventional techniques and learn breakthroughs in enterprise management.

We want to employ a new management consulting model that calls for modify by both the enterprise employing consultants and the management consultants and consulting firms. The enterprise must have the capability to manage its own development and manage the achievement of rewards. The consultants should get away from employing rote methodologies, and return to professionalism to function in partnership with the enterprise.

The new consulting model includes the following components on the element of the enterprise:

o Structure the enterprise to define and manage precisely what the enterprise need to do to be productive

o Structure enterprise capital to manage all capital utilized to produce enterprise achievement

o Install a skilled capability to manage enterprise investments and development programs

The new consulting model requires the following on the portion of consultants:

o Support the enterprise understand and strategy the value to be produced by alter and improvement to give the return on the investment

o Function with the enterprise in partnership to generate precisely-defined value

o Offer verified experts with analytical capabilities and specialty experience

o Leverage the enterprise teams to create enterprise merchandise and improvements. Do not do anything that the enterprise can do itself

o Operate with the enterprise by way of to utilization of improvements for benefit and return on investment

o Do not implement data systems, implement the enhanced method that incorporates the method

o Do not supply consultant deliverables for review. All documents are accepted enterprise expertise and records. There is 1 consultant deliverable, shared enterprise results

Management consultants need the new model to remove the old problems and danger in gaining advantage from organization alter and management improvement. Only when we have a way for the enterprise and their consultants to perform together in partnership for measured good results, will we have a way for consultants to return to the professionalism of old. open site in new window go details