利用者:AndrewsCosme117
出典: くみこみックス
Basically we can debate whether the Supreme Court decision in Citizen's United that opened the doorway to unlimited cash in political campaigns from corporations and wealthy individuals was right or wrong, the reality is that this ruling has been created and is also unlikely being reversed. And what is not debatable is always that cash is pouring into election campaigns, at this stage particularly about the republican side, from big business and rich individuals who wish to influence things with either their chosen candidate or against another.
mitt romney - This silver lining within the Supreme Court ruling was that Super PACs must disclose their donors and the amount they donated. Perhaps this would decrease the level of later corruption because of the have to pay back these mega donors - at least the public will be mindful of the possibilities. In case a corporation donates seven figures with a GOP Super PAC that supports a specific candidate, understanding that corporation would reap the benefits of having environmental regulations lifted, the public can be fully mindful of this possibility and phone him or her about it.
The bigger question, then, is whether or not individuals will actually take time to focus on where this Super PAC money is coming from, and what these mega donors are hoping to help using their money. Already there is evidence the system is finding loopholes that may hurt this process. The most obvious spirit with the dependence on disclosure of donors would have been to permit the voter to completely understand where the campaign messages are coming from before each election. It is a vital step in ensuring a well-informed voter. Yet we percieve that Super PACs have taken advantage of a delay tactic that allows them in some instances to hold back to disclose their donors until after voting has brought place - when it comes to the 2012 Republican primaries, until following the important voting in Iowa, Nh and South Carolina.
super pac - The voters over these important early states visited the polls without a complete understanding of the intentions behind the campaign messages that they had been hearing, and the reasons for funding for that political ads. As it turns out many of the funders with the ads were gas and oil executives, land developers, and chemical company executives. It had been certainly their directly to donate beneath the Supreme Court decision, however the voters must have been conscious that these industries possess a lot to gain by any loosening of environmental regulations, reductions in operation regulation, and/or lower government oversight.
anti tea party - If the candidate is elected in 2012 and Super PACs helped, you will have obvious pressure to pay back bring in more business with favorable legislation, government support, or lower regulation? Once elected the state run quickly has to think about re-election. Again, these Super PACs appear to be largely a tool from the GOP - it really is their right but it also should open them as much as some added scrutiny. Young people need to pay attention to the disclosures and stay aware of this dynamic. As well as the government should pursue legislation which makes disclosure almost immediate.
